The meeting focused on developing strategies for resource management and potential competition frameworks in an educational context. Participants discussed the ongoing challenge of limited resources (specifically mentioning printer shortages) and explored options for implementing a rewards-based system to better manage these resources.

Competition Considerations

Discussion about the inherent nature of competitions having winners and losers
Recognition that competitions serve as extrinsic motivators
Acknowledgment that optimal change occurs when combining both intrinsic and extrinsic motivations
Observation that performance comprehension can have both positive and negative aspects

Fairness Concerns

Significant concern raised about fairness when comparing schools of different sizes
Suggestion to match schools of similar size for more equitable comparison (e.g., comparing Colcha with a similarly-sized school rather than with larger institutions)
Discussion about using percentage-based metrics for more fair comparisons

Action Items

[ ] Form a mini-committee to develop a proposal for resource management
[ ] Create specific criteria for the competition/reward system that accounts for differences in school sizes
[ ] Develop a complete proposal leveraging knowledge of both title and EP strategies

Notes

Transcript

But it's great. It has a look that we are going to earn. Because we are missing a printer. We are always missing so many things. I don't know if we could put in there some of the measures, the possibilities that could be used to manage a resource, some kind of reward, I don't know, an investor, I don't know, something like that.

What do you think? The issue is the criteria. When you enter a competition, there is always a winner and a loser. That is the theme of the contests.

Some people use it more than others. It mobilizes as an extrinsic incentive. The change happens when you combine the intrinsic with the extrinsic. You have to know that middle point. You have to play with it. There is no problem. Performance comprehension has its positive side, but it also has a negative side.

Sometimes performance comprehension is looking at things that are no longer necessary. It's extrinsic, but it's a moving coin. Whether you want it or not, it's a moving coin. But in this case, I don't know what you think. There are small students who, as you know, wouldn't be able to compete with a school that has a lot of students.

It would be nice to compare Colcha with a school. I don't know who Angiara is, because he's small. We're not the same. Why don't we make a mini-committee, and you create that, and you make a proposal, and together we give life to it. But you have the proposal, since you know the strategy, how both the title and the EP work, right?

Something you wanted to add? No, no, by percentage is what we were talking about. ¿Algo más? Al margen de todo.

Summary

Notes

Transcript