📘 Exhibit W – Fraud Upon the Court Dossier

Filed By: :Waseem: Malik.
Court: East Berkshire Magistrates’ Court
Date: 21 July 2025
Case Ref: 432500137947
Judicial Review Ref: AC-2025-LON-001909
Legal Basis: CPR 5.4B, CPR 31.14, Halsbury’s Laws Vol 8(2), Common Law Fraud Standard

🔹 Contents of Dossier

Item	Description
W1 – Judicial Non-Response Record	Proof that the presiding judge failed to acknowledge or rule upon Notice of Defect in Jurisdiction, Exhibit T, or WRIT OF QUO WARRANTO
W2 – Clerk Certification Failure	Clerk refused or failed to record and certify jurisdictional objection verbatim under CPR 5.4B despite lawful demand
W3 – CPR 31.14 Disclosure Request	Formal request for unaltered audio recordings of entire July 21 hearing to detect edits, omissions, or suppression of objection and lawful appearance
W4 – Affidavit of Truth & Harm	Statement attesting that any omission of objection from transcript constitutes fraud and procedural conspiracy to bypass codified jurisdiction

⚖️ Legal Maxims & Case Authorities

“Fraud vitiates everything.” — Halsbury’s Laws Vol 8(2)
“Jurisdiction once challenged cannot be assumed; it must be proven.”
Chisholm v Georgia (1793) — Sovereignty belongs to the Man, not the fiction
R v Sussex Justices, ex p McCarthy (1924) — Apparent bias invalidates proceedings
Re Tarling (1927) — Record omissions are procedural fraud
CPR 5.4B: Right of access to any filed statement, objection, or transcript
CPR 31.14: Right to request disclosure of evidence held by the court

📌 Relief & Demands

Immediate production of full unredacted audio from 21 July hearing
Certified transcript under CPR 5.4B including oral jurisdictional objection
Declaration that judicial silence constitutes a fraud upon the court
Re-entry of objection into public record if omitted
Referral to High Court under AC-2025-LON-001909 as part of evidentiary bundle