Filed By: :Waseem: Malik. – Living Man, Sui Juris
Date of Filing: 20 July 2025
Venue: High Court of Justice – King’s Bench Division
Judicial Review Ref: AC-2025-LON-001909
Respondent: Director of Public Prosecutions (CPS)
Para 71 – Public Interest Test Failing:“…the decision must be made with the utmost rigour…subject to challenge in judicial review.”
Para 72 – Justification Mandate:“…Courts must be given intelligible reasons to justify discontinuance. Silence or unreasoned refusal is unlawful.”
📌 Applied Context:
CPS refusal to engage with private prosecution (Exhibit AA) lacks both rigour and intelligible justification.
Claimant has filed charges under Contempt of Court Act, Misfeasance, and Obstruction — all documented, sworn, and unrebutted. CPS silence constitutes actionable dishonour.
| Directive | Outcome |
|---|---|
| CPS permits prosecution | Admits procedural collapse by Thames Valley Police |
| CPS blocks prosecution unlawfully | Gujra doctrine triggers judicial censure & contempt exposure |
🧨 Trap Activated: Any CPS attempt to dismiss or ignore the application without express reasoning activates Gujra-based judicial review under Ref: AC-2025-LON-001909.
📂 Suggested File Name:
Exhibit_H_GujraIndictment_CPS_Malik_2025-07-20.pdf
📎 **CE-File Label:**Gujra Application / CPS Obstruction / Judicial Review Weaponization
💬 CE-File Comment: