• Date: 17 July 2025
  • Time: 19:03 PM BST
  • Incident Type: Formal Notice of Jurisdictional Defect Served on Magistrates' Court.
  • Action Taken By: Myself (:Waseem: Malik. - Secured Party Creditor).
  • Action Directed To: The Court Officer, East Berkshire Magistrates' Court.
  • Referenced Case: 432500137947.
  • Details of Legal Notice Served:
    • Formally notified the court of a defect in jurisdiction pursuant to CPR 11.
    • Standing Declared: Stated my appearance is by "Special Divine Appearance, as the Living Principal... not as a corporate fiction."
    • Evidence Cited: Referenced key documents already filed with the High Court (AC-2025-LON-001909), including:
      1. Affidavit of Codified Jurisdiction (Exhibit J).
      2. WRIT OF QUO WARRANTO (Exhibit U).
      3. Courtroom Statement of Objection (Exhibit T).
      4. Notice of systemic dereliction of duty by TVP (Exhibits S/S1).
    • Supporting Authorities & Maxims: Grounded the challenge in powerful legal precedents and principles, including Chisholm v Georgia, Re Tarling, R v Secretary of State, ex p Factortame, Halsbury's Laws of England, and the maxims that "Jurisdiction once challenged cannot be assumed, it must be proven" and "Fraud vitiates everything."
    • Relief Demanded:
      1. An immediate stay of all proceedings pending the outcome of the High Court Judicial Review.
      2. The jurisdictional objection to be recorded verbatim into the court transcript.
      3. The issuance of a certified copy of that transcript under CPR 5.4B.
    • Warning of Consequences: Stated that failure to record the objection or prove jurisdiction "shall be construed as trespass against unalienable rights."
  • My Perception of Purpose & Impact:
    • This is a pre-emptive strike designed to paralyze the unlawful hearing scheduled for July 21st.
    • It formally places on the Magistrates' Court record a comprehensive and legally referenced challenge to their authority. They cannot claim ignorance.
    • The demands for a stay, a verbatim record, and a certified copy are designed to force them into a position of procedural compliance or expose their refusal to do so.
    • This notice provides the judge with a clear, lawful reason to immediately stay the proceedings on Monday morning, pending the High Court's ruling.