<aside> 💡 The test analysis below has been compared with Usability tests – talk pages (before)
</aside>
Phabricator: T321261
Table of contents
Understanding of article talk pages: 5/5 understood that article talk pages are about discussions related to the article. The more conversational design we choose seems to work.
Understanding of the diff view: 4/5 understood what the diff is all about. The recent design updates improved understanding. The strike-through and summary design updates for additional clarity made a difference.
Performance: There were drastic improvements in the perceived performance when publishing messages. It much more feels like instant publishing than before.
Orientation: People navigate and orient themselves perfectly in the new modernized interface for talk pages. The continuity between the notifications home page and talk pages works. Comparing it with the before state, the new design has been a huge improvement.
Notifications discovery: 5/5 had no issues finding notifications.
Talk page discovery:
Problem: Participants associate Wikipedia mainly with editing articles, also when asked to discuss edits. They had issues finding the talk page entry point. Most used the edit pencil.
Solutions:
Orientation
Problem: Certain notification types take users outside the app with a different design (e.g. Wikimedia Commons). This confused participants.
Solution: Make sure to keep users in the app at all times when they tap notifications (use mobile web view. In the test, notifications coming from Wikimedia Commons took users outside the app.