Adema, Janneke, ‘Overview of Open Access Models for Ebooks in the Humanities and Social Sciences’, Oapen, March, 2010 <https://curve.coventry.ac.uk/open/file/a976330e-ed7a-4bd5-b0ed-47cab90e9a5e/1/ademaoapen2comb.pdf> [accessed 8 May 2018]
Adema, Janneke, and Gary Hall, ‘The Political Nature of the Book: On Artists’ Books and Radical Open Access’, New Formations, 78 (2013), 138–56 <https://curve.coventry.ac.uk/open/file/bec7fd48-e138-4bb1-840e-bc664e3e6ca1/1/The political nature of the book.pdf>
Adema, Janneke, and Samuel A. Moore, ‘Collectivity and Collaboration: Imagining New Forms of Communality to Create Resilience in Scholar-Led Publishing’, UKSGInsights, 31 (2018) <https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.399>
Agnes Grudniewicz, David Moher, Kelly D. Cobey, and others, 'Predatory journals: no definition, no defence', Nature, 576 (2019) <http://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-03759-y>
Beverungen, A., S. Bohm, and C. Land, ‘The Poverty of Journal Publishing’, Organization, 19, 929–38 <http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1350508412448858>
Beverungen, Armin, Steffen Böhm, and Christopher Land, ‘From the Open Road to the High Seas? Piracy, Damnation and Resistance in Academic Consumption of Publishing’, Prometheus, 31 (2013), 241–47 <http://repository.essex.ac.uk/9696/>
Boshears, Paul F., ‘Open Access Publishing as a Para-Academic Proposition: OA as Labour Relation’, TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 11 (2013), 614–19 <https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v11i2.529>
Chan, Leslie (Ed.) Contextualizing Openness: Situating Open Science.(Canada: University of Ottawa Press, (2019) <https://www.idrc.ca/en/book/contextualizing-openness-situating-open-science>
Deville, J., Sondervan, J., Stone, G. and Wennström, S., ‘Rebels with a Cause? Supporting Library and Academic-led Open Access Publishing’, LIBER Quarterly, 29(1) (2019), pp.1–28 <http://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10277>
Eve, Martin, and Caroline Edwards, ‘Opening the Open Library of Humanities’, Open Library of Humanities, 1 (2015) <https://doi.org/10.16995/olh.46>
Eve, Martin Paul, ‘All That Glisters: Investigating Collective Funding Mechanisms for Gold Open Access in Humanities Disciplines’, Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 2 (2014) <http://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.1131>
———, ‘How Learned Societies Could Flip to Open Access, With No Author-Facing Charges, Using a Consortial Model’, Martin Paul Eve, 2018 <https://www.martineve.com/2018/01/21/how-learned-societies-could-flip-to-oa-using-a-consortial-model/> [accessed 4 May 2018]
———, ‘How Much Does It Cost to Run a Small Scholarly Publisher?’, Martin Paul Eve, 2017 <https://www.martineve.com/2017/02/13/how-much-does-it-cost-to-run-a-small-scholarly-publisher/> [accessed 4 May 2018]
———, ‘Librarian Evaluation of Non-APC OA Models in the Age of Open Access’, Martin Paul Eve, 2018 <https://www.martineve.com/2017/04/01/librarian-evaluation-of-non-apc-oa-models-in-the-age-of-open-access/> [accessed 4 May 2018]
———, ‘On the Economics of Flipping Subscription Journals’, Martin Paul Eve, 2017 <https://www.martineve.com/2017/03/11/on-the-economics-of-flipping-subscription-journals/> [accessed 4 May 2018]
———, Open Access and the Humanities: Contexts, Controversies and the Future (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014) <http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316161012>
———, ‘Open Access Resources and Evaluation; or: Why OA Journals Might Fare Badly in Terms of Conventional Usage’, Martin Paul Eve, 2018 <https://www.martineve.com/2018/01/19/open-access-resources-and-evaluation-or-why-oa-journals-might-fare-badly-in-terms-of-usage/> [accessed 4 May 2018]
Eve, Martin Paul and Andy Byers, ‘Janeway: A Scholarly Communications Platform’, UKSG Insights, 31: 15, 1–4 (2018) <https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.396>
Eve, M.P., Clemente Vega, P. and Edwards, C., 'Lessons From the Open Library of Humanities'. LIBER Quarterly, 30, (2020) pp.1–18 <http://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10327>
Eve, Martin Paul, Kitty Inglis, David Prosser, Lara Speicher, and Graham Stone, ‘Cost Estimates of an Open Access Mandate for Monographs in the UK’s Third Research Excellence Framework’, UKSG Insights, 30 (2017) <https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.392>