-
[Joe/Kevin] Passport protocol DAO addition to Essential Intents
-
[Kris] Proposed update org CSDO Calls
-
Tactical Tuesday calls
-
Strategic Friday calls
- Format
- Every other Friday
- Pre-reading required (!)
- 2 representatives per workstream, ideally ws lead(s) + scribe + max 1-2 (!) topic specialists
- Time split over proposed topics in preceding tuesday calls
- Moderated by topic provider (OP), by Kris or by Sam (monthly), for now: works with handraising, we follow the order, limit crosstalk
- ALTERNATIVE: keep monthly cadence if we go to 90’ calls
-
[Joe] “Strong Leadership” over “decentralization” was on our even overs. What do we mean by that?
- Does that mean Workstream leads? Steward council? Fostering emergent leadership?
- How should the role of Workstream lead be elected Or selected?
- Do we have a goal of workstreams being autonomous or decentralized? How would we measure it?
-
[Joe] What did we like and not like about different proposals and the process this last budget season
- What did/didn’t we like?
- Timing/Runbook
- UX of participation
- Contributors experience in workstreams
- Best practices we noticed
- Worst aspects we would like to avoid?
- Other questions?
- Why did so few of us post on each other’s budget proposals?
- How can we get a stronger signal from CSDO to stewards? Should CSDO put out one ratified signal and individuals can still put out their arguments for me against?
- Why did so few workstreams use measurable results in their proposals?
-
[Joe] How do we draw ethical vs efficiency boundaries?
- V3 governance conflict of interest clause - people in workstreams cannot vote for their own budget… aren’t they working to earn governance?
- Algorithmic bias considerations