To: Gee Harland, Court & Crime Reporter, Newsquest Media Group Ltd From: :Waseem: Malik — Sovereign Legal Strategist Date of Original Notice: 1 August 2023 Subject: Misreporting, Witness Status, and Symbolic Sabotage

I. Summary of Allegations

You published an article on 19 June 2023 and a follow-up on 1 August 2023 that misrepresented lawful proceedings at Reading Crown Court. You described me as “almost arrested” — despite witnessing physical violence, unlawful arrest, and forced entry into the dock.

Your reporting omitted key facts:

• The police physically assaulted me and pushed me into the dock.
• You witnessed this and failed to report it as a crime.
• You mocked my lawful standing and metaphysical identity.

II. Witness Status

You were present in court and observed the events. Your failure to report the violence constitutes journalistic negligence and complicity. I hereby notify you that you may be subpoenaed as a witness in future proceedings.

You will be asked to testify to:

• The physical actions of the police.
• The court’s treatment of my lawful standing.
• Your editorial decisions and framing of the event.

III. Symbolic Clarification

You are hereby asked:

• Do you understand the lawful distinction between MR WASEEM MALIK (corporate fiction) and Waseem Malik (living man)?
• Do you recognise the metaphysical difference between a man and a person?
• Do you acknowledge your role in shaping public perception through narrative distortion?

IV. Final Notice

Your reporting constitutes information warfare and symbolic sabotage. You are now formally on record as a potential witness and participant in the wider campaign against lawful dissent.