Physics still clings to the illusion of an always-present, fully-rendered universe. It assumes that space is permanent, objects persist regardless of observation, and time flows evenly everywhere. But this doesn't satisfy the evidence.
Quantum mechanics shows that particles behave like waves of probability - until they're observed. The double-slit experiment, entanglement, and quantum decoherence all suggest that observation doesnt just reveal reality - it helps create it.
And yet, we act as if the universe is still “running in the background” like a film reel. What if that assumption is wrong?
There is no such thing as an objective “now,” or a fully-loaded world. In Relatodynamics, the universe doesn't exist in full - it is calculated locally, through interactions between systems.
Where nothing is being observed or computed, nothing exists.
This explains why unmeasured particles behave probabilistically, and why distant regions of the cosmos appear to “stretch” or “glitch” - they may not have been fully computed yet.
If Relatodynamics is correct:
This could unify quantum physics, cosmology, and simulation theory under a single framework - one where the universe isn't treated as a thing but treated as an ongoing negotiation between observers.