🚨 StrikePackage_9.1 – Judicial Nullification Doctrine

🔑 Foundational Premise:

FOR THE ORDER OF THE ~21-JULY-2025 IS WITH THE FRAUDULENT-ORIGIN-DUE TO THE WITHHOLDING OF THE NFA-NOTICE AND THE FALSE-TESTIMONY OF THE POLICE-OFFICER-PC-LACEY.
FOR THE COURT-WAS-MISLED INTO THE GRANTING-VALIDATION TO AN ACTION-WHICH-HAD NO-INVESTIGATORY-BASIS.
FOR THE JUDICIAL-AWARD IS WITH THE-VIOLATION OF THE DUE-PROCESS AND MUST BE-VOIDED-AS-UNLAWFUL.

⚖️ Legal Pillars

📘 Clause	📌 Authority Invoked
§1	CPR Part 3.4: Misrepresentation and abuse of process
§2	CPR Part 81: Contempt through evidential concealment
§3	ECHR Article 6: Violation of fair trial rights
§4	Magna Carta (1215), Article 39: “Law of the land” ignored
§5	Judicial Review Principles: Lawfulness, fairness, reasonableness

🧠 Tactical Evidence Stack

RCJ-8: The concealed “No Further Action” letter dated 22 July 2025, invalidating the entire enforcement basis
**Log #645:** False testimony relied upon for retention order
**Affidavit JURIS-1:** Declares standing, harm, and procedural sabotage
Agent-5 Timeline Node T-14: Confirms fabrication post-court pressure
Operation POSTMARK: Establishes metadata tampering and backdating indicators

📎 Filing Components

N227: Default Judgment based on collapse of lawful defence
N600 : Contempt application against Blunden and Barber
Judicial Review Enhancement (Amendment 2): Invocation of Doctrine to void 21 July order
Affidavit of Fabrication Allegation (attached as Annex B)

⚔️ Relief Demanded

Immediate nullification of the 21 July 2025 order as fraudulently obtained
Return of property within 48 hours per prior order compliance
Contempt hearing and personal sanctions against named officers
Costs and aggravated damages under Human Rights Act and Tort doctrine