What is the problem? & Why are we solving it?

With pools we have a protocol agnostic UX where the sidebar button is the action. you click pools to pool liquidity. We will abstract this to multichain when we have tight Thorchain parity LP multichain- next steps (start with the unicorn)

we should make a staking page that is protocol agnostic too. It would show you:

• actions you can take with assets you already have

• rFOX CTA

• (needs Portals (aka zaps)) but trending staking opportunity by category

  • Vanilla staking
  • LP staking
  • Stake and gauge
  • Yearn assets
  • ( ETH restaking: vanilla ETH staking via eETH, vanilla stETH pools, multichain stETH, LRTs)

• one suggested path to get into any of these opportunities

• should we be “the interface to staking?” strategy spike

How does it help Shapeshift users or DAO?

Having a staking page with unique opportunities that go accross more than one blockchain will unlock more revs (we’d charge on portals ) and give people a simpler way in and out of complex products once they grok that Shapeshift has these displayed and acitonable.

How are we solving it?

What are the requirements (engineering, marketing, grants etc.)?

What are the risks and how will we mitigate them?

Does this effect EOA wallets, UTXO wallets, Smart Contract Wallets, Hardware wallets, or a limited scope of them?

Does this cross multiple blockchains?

Does this require complex signatures?

Technical due diligence

<aside> 💡 Articulate how & what technical due diligence was completed. Or what technical blockers were communicated to a partner and when they were resolved.

</aside>