Agenda:

• look over form comments and ratings
• What worked, what didn’t work?
• looking forward to Season 2

Results of Feedback Form

Category: Impact feedback rating: 6.75 out of 10 Comments:

• Funds spread thin made for drop in the bucket impact Marzipan: sounds like whale in big community - it was meaningful amount for smaller communities
• It would be good to have a bounty for all the applications to make the round more like a on boarding process at the same time.
• i had a hard time with some projects that have VC funding or plenty of sponsors in the past (edge/zugarden) taking the funding spots away from more grassroot communities for whom this would actually make a big difference Marzipan: how do we restrict the round to smaller communities? Dinesh: people in his community aren’t online

Category: Governance Process feedback rating: 6.00 out of 10 Comments:

• It is good to include the time (conviction) element in the voting. But it also generates other considerations on how to win the voting game.
• Don't have a solution but making it less of a popularity vote and easier for non-crypto natives to partake would be an incredible improvement Marzipan: this is big issue - took lots of hand-holding Dinesh: yes, should be this way but is hard.
• there is something about the competition mindset that always saddens me a little.
• Dinesh: how do we make this available to people offline / in the real world?

Category: Gardens UI/UX feedback rating: 6.00 out of 10