Each entry in the library uses a 10-point scorecard that rates key credibility signals like author transparency, source citation, bias, domain authority, and more. With a total score out of 20, the system provides a clear visual cue for:
This tool is ideal for content creators, researchers, students, journalists, and anyone who wants to separate signal from noise in an age of information overload.
Rate each category from 0 (No), 1 (Somewhat), or 2 (Strong Yes) based on the article’s content and presentation.
| Category | Description | Score (0-2) |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Author Transparency | Is the author's name, background, and expertise clearly stated? | |
| 2. Source Citation | Are claims backed by credible sources, links, or references? | |
| 3. Date & Relevance | Is the content recent or clearly marked with a publish/update date? | |
| 4. Bias & Balance | Does it present multiple viewpoints or acknowledge limitations? | |
| 5. Fact vs. Opinion | Are facts and opinions clearly separated? | |
| 6. Domain Authority | Is it published on a reputable site or journal (e.g., .edu, .gov, etc.)? | |
| 7. Writing Quality | Is the writing clear, coherent, and free of manipulation or hype? | |
| 8. Expertise Signal | Does the author demonstrate subject-matter expertise with examples? | |
| 9. Community Trust | Does the article have high engagement, peer recognition, or shares? | |
| 10. Visual Integrity | Are charts, infographics, and media used ethically and labeled well? |
(Choose one)