When you add employees to the picture, the retirement plan conversation changes from "how much can I put away?" to "how much do I want to do for my team — and what does that actually cost?" The answer is almost always less than the sticker math suggests. SECURE 2.0 auto-enrollment applies to new 401(k) plans, but real employer match costs stay lower than the stated rate because many auto-enrolled employees still don't contribute. Safe Harbor 401(k) is the most common landing spot. The startup credit — up to $5,000/year for three years — is real, significant, and underused.
"I frame it as playing fair — you can't have one set of rules for the owner and a different set of rules for employees when it comes to tax-advantaged structures like retirement plans. Once a client accepts that logic, the next question is: do I actually want to fund retirement for this person? That conversation usually leads straight to Safe Harbor."
— Neal McSpadden, Founder, Tax Sherpa
Key Takeaways
Every owner who operates with a SEP IRA and then hires their first employee will eventually have the same conversation with Neal: the SEP's simplicity comes with a non-negotiable string attached. Under IRS rules, an employer contribution to a SEP must be made at the same percentage for every eligible employee as the owner receives. If you contribute 20% of your own compensation to your SEP, you owe 20% of each eligible employee's compensation to their SEP — no exceptions, no waiting periods beyond the plan's eligibility rules, no opt-outs.
This is what "playing fair" means in the retirement plan context. The tax code does not permit one contribution structure for the principal and a different structure for the staff. That parity rule is not a penalty — it is the fundamental design of employer-sponsored retirement plans. The SEP just makes it visible earlier than other plan types because the contribution is calculated as a flat percentage of compensation across the board.
For many owners, the reaction to this explanation is immediate: they don't want to fund retirement contributions for an employee they hired part-time last quarter. That reaction is completely legitimate. It is also the signal that a SEP is no longer the right vehicle — and that a Safe Harbor 401(k) should be the next step.
The takeaway: hiring your first employee is the trigger for a plan design review. Not eventually. At the point of hire.