<aside>
Why deep tech investing is different, the Power Law, fund-return math, and what VCs really screen for (team, market, capital efficiency).
Deep tech venture capital is fundamentally different from software investing. While software VCs can take market risks and iterate quickly, deep tech VCs need a more disciplined approach due to the longer development cycles and higher capital requirements.
Venture capital operates on the Power Law: most investments fail, a few do okay, and one or two generate massive returns that make the entire fund profitable. For deep tech VCs, this math is even more extreme.
The brutal reality:
This means deep tech VCs need each investment to have credible potential to return the fund.
It's not enough to build a good business – you need to build a business that could theoretically return an entire fund on its own.
<aside> <img src="notion://custom_emoji/8c512b4b-3b9c-48d6-9077-f4e1229f1ddd/233b7f25-b3aa-80f0-b385-007a770e2172" alt="notion://custom_emoji/8c512b4b-3b9c-48d6-9077-f4e1229f1ddd/233b7f25-b3aa-80f0-b385-007a770e2172" width="40px" />
Fund size matters: A $20M fund can get excited about a $100M exit. A $200M fund needs billion-dollar outcomes. Understanding your VC's fund size and return requirements is crucial for alignment.
</aside>
Because deep tech carries inherent technical risk – will the science actually work? Can you build what you're proposing? – most deep tech VCs compensate by minimising other types of risk:
Deep tech VCs are looking for the intersection of: