Objective

Produce a dry-run litigation-calendar sync for Payton Klatt by grounding the review in live matter and event data, then surface where litigation matters are active versus silent.

What changed

• Reviewed Payton's open matters and isolated the litigation-stage subset.
• Compared those matters against upcoming calendar activity and separated high-confidence Payton-tagged events from lower-confidence surname matches that need verification.
• Identified that only 3 of 11 litigation-stage matters had any upcoming calendar activity and that 8 litigation matters were effectively silent in the upcoming-event window.
• Captured a matter-by-matter event list plus follow-up recommendations for trial-date visibility and litigation workflow cleanup.

Commands and live systems touched

• Source log: /Users/samaguiar/Documents/Projects/admin/session_logs/2026-05-26-outlook-litify-payton-sync.md
• Live systems touched: Litify matter data and Outlook calendar/event context used to build the dry run.
• Output included high-confidence Payton event rows, verify-needed surname matches, and silent-litigation matter flags.

Rollback state

• This was a read-only dry run and reporting pass.
• No live records were mutated, so no rollback action was required.

Open follow-up

• Verify whether the surname-match events truly belong to Payton's matters or reflect collisions with other attorneys' calendars.
• Decide whether to build a recurring silent-litigation monitor or a trial-date missing tile from this evidence.
• Use the silent-litigation list to confirm whether those matters are stalled, off-calendar, or missing expected litigation events.

Pickup prompt

Resume from /Users/samaguiar/Documents/Projects/admin/session_logs/2026-05-26-outlook-litify-payton-sync.md. Treat this as a read-only handoff: first verify the seven surname-match matters, then turn the confirmed gaps into either a litigation-calendar dashboard tile or a one-time cleanup list for the legal team.