FAQ

  1. Is UAE free zone still under consideration as restructuring?

    1. No, because the Cabinet of Ministers has issued Cabinet Decision No. 55 of 2023(effective from 1 June 2023) for determining Qualifying Income for the Qualifying Free Zone Persons under the Federal Decree-Law No. 47 of 2022 (’the CT Law’). Further, the Ministry of Finance has issued Ministerial Decision No. 139 of 2023 (effective from 1 June 2023) defining the terms “Qualifying Activities” and “Excluded Activities” for the purpose of the CT Law supplementing the said Cabinet Decision.
    2. In short, we won’t be able to qualified to have “Qualifying Activities” and “Excluded Activities” under their new law.

    UAE corporate tax : New decisions relating to free zones

  2. Is RC4651 Guidance on Country-By-Country Reporting in Canada relevant to our business operation?

    1. No, because only the big Multinational Enterprise (MNE) Group, the ones that earn over €750 million have to worry about filing these CbC reports to the CRA.
  3. How Canada Fight Against Aggressive International Tax Avoidance?

    Backgrounder: The Next Step in the Fight Against Aggressive International Tax Avoidance

  4. Is Panama part of Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent Base Erosion and Profit Shifting ("Multilateral Instrument" or "BEPS MLI")?

    1. Yes, as seen from:

    Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent BEPS - OECD

    <aside> 💡 Panama

    Exchange of information on request (EOIR)
    Global Forum membership yes
    EOIR rating round 1 prov. largely compliant
    EOIR rating round 2 partially compliant
    Mutual Administrative Assistance Convention in force
    Automatic exchange of information (AEOI)
    Commitment to AEOI (CRS) 2018
    CRS MCAA signed yes
    Review of the AEOI legal frameworks in place but needs improvement
    Initial review of effectiveness in practice of AEOI non-compliant
    Mutual Administrative Assistance Convention in force
    BEPS
    Inclusive Framework on BEPS membership yes
    Outcome Statement on the Two-Pillar Solution to Address the Tax Challenges Arising from the Digitalisation of the Economy (11 July 2023) participates in agreement
    Existence of harmful tax regimes (Action 5) not harmful (no harmful regime exists)
    Exchange of information on tax rulings (Action 5) reviewed/no recommendations
    Preventing treaty abuse (Action 6) 2022 review completed
    CbC – Domestic law (Action 13) legal framework in place
    CbC – Information exchange network (Action 13) activated
    Effective dispute resolution (Action 14) review to be scheduled/deferred
    Multilateral Instrument (Action 15) in force
    </aside>

Streamlined Framework in International Taxation and Corporate Restructuring

  1. Operational Realism:
  2. Minimizing Tax Liabilities within Legal Framework:
  3. Corporate Integrity and Transparency:

Abstract Plan and Taxation Questions

classDiagram
    class ParentCompany {
        - Based in Country A
        - Holds Full Ownership of Subsidiary
    }
    class Subsidiary {
        - Based in Country B
        - Managed by Local Nominee Director
        - Generates Income from International Markets
    }
    class NomineeDirector {
        - Local Management in Country B
        - Executes Operational Control
    }
    class InternationalMarkets {
        - Sources of Income
        - External to Countries A & B
    }
    class TaxConsiderations {
        - Tax Residency of Subsidiary
        - Tax Treatment of Foreign-Sourced Income
    }

    ParentCompany --|> Subsidiary : "Wholly Owns"
    Subsidiary --|> NomineeDirector : "Managed by"
    Subsidiary --|> InternationalMarkets : "Derives Income from"
    Subsidiary --|> TaxConsiderations : "Raises Tax Questions"

Explanation

  1. Ownership Structure: A corporate entity domiciled in Country A holds full ownership of a subsidiary based in Country B. This parent-subsidiary relationship is critical for understanding the overall corporate structure and its implications.
  2. Management and Control: Operational control of the subsidiary is maintained locally in Country B through a nominee director. This aspect of the structure is key in determining where the actual management and control of the subsidiary are exercised.
  3. Income Sources: The subsidiary’s revenue streams are exclusively derived from international markets, external to both Country A and Country B. The source of income is an important factor in assessing tax liabilities and compliance requirements.
  4. Tax Considerations: This configuration presents unique tax considerations pertaining to the subsidiary's residency status and the treatment of its foreign-sourced income, considering the distinct jurisdictions of ownership, management, and revenue generation. Understanding these tax implications is vital for effective cross-border tax planning.

Each component of this diagram and the accompanying text highlights a specific aspect of your corporate setup, aiding in a clearer understanding of its potential tax and legal implications.

Restructuring Overview