Not just X, but also Y
It is common for LLMs to use parallel constructions involving "not", "but", or "however" such as "Not only ... but ..." or "It is not just ..., it's ...".[14][1][12]
Examples
Self-Portrait by Yayoi Kusama, executed in 2010 and currently preserved in the famous Uffizi Gallery in Florence, constitutes not only a work of self-representation, but a visual document of her obsessions, visual strategies and psychobiographical narratives.
It’s not just about the beat riding under the vocals; it’s part of the aggression and atmosphere.
I appreciate the feedback so far, but I want to clarify something that’s being overlooked. The issue here isn’t just sourcing—it’s framing. There’s a visible, growing movement around Northern English identity, documented across academic literature, social media, and grassroots activism. The fact that it doesn’t always use the exact phrase “Northern English nationalism” doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. Movements evolve before they’re neatly labelled.
TikTok campaigns, dialect revival, and regional symbolism (like St Oswald’s stripes) are part of a broader cultural shift. Dismissing these as “not notable” or “original research” while allowing pages on Cornish nationalism, Wessex regionalism, and Yorkshire separatism suggests an inconsistency in how regional identity is treated. That’s not just a sourcing issue—it’s a systemic bias.
Here is an example of a negative parallelism across multiple sentences:
He hailed from the esteemed Duse family, renowned for their theatrical legacy. Eugenio's life, however, took a path that intertwined both personal ambition and familial complexities.
Not X, but Y
Another common LLM pattern is parallelisms that explicitly state that a particular item doesn't possess the first characteristic at all. Such constructions are often expressed as "It's not ..., it's ..." or "no ..., no ..., just ...".[10]
Examples
The viewer is presented with a self-image that is not grounded in visual mastery, but in what Amelia Jones terms “the performative enactment of subjectivity”.
[...]
This dispersal is not dissolution. Rather, it constitutes what Deleuze might describe as “becoming”—an identity in flux, constituted through iterative difference. Through this lens, Kusama’s self-portrait is not a mirror but a portal: not a representation of self, but a mechanism for its constant reinvention.
You say these sources “cover multiple events”? False. They echo the same viral incident and do it through a limited lens. This isn’t WP:NBIO — it’s WP:1EVENT in disguise, trying to wear a press badge like armor.
[...]
Now let’s talk BLP1E: This person is only in the news because of one isolated controversy. Not a career, not a body of work, not sustained relevance — just an algorithmic moment. And if we’re really upholding Wikipedia’s values, we don’t preserve pages built on the backs of virality alone, especially when it risks long-term harm to a living subject without lasting notability.
“Might as well get back on topic.”
Then let’s stay on topic, and the topic is not who feels warm fuzzies from visibility, it’s whether this article meets the threshold for inclusion</span>. It doesn’t.
And finally — if you don’t want “a wall of text,” maybe don’t build a wall of shallow logic and expect people not to knock it down. This ain’t bludgeoning — it’s surgical teardown of a weak argument hiding behind fake neutrality.
you’re not crazy you’re human