Introduction | What These Interviews Really Are

Behavioural interviews for engineering and technical leadership roles are not tests of personality. They are tests of judgment.

Interviewers are trying to reduce risk. They want evidence that you can make good decisions when the constraints conflict. They want to see how you think when the system is messy, the timeline is real, and the incentives are misaligned.

Your goal is not to sound impressive. Your goal is to make your judgment visible.

This guide is designed for Engineering Manager, Senior Engineering Manager, and Head of Engineering roles, but it is written to be usable by adjacent leaders too.

Think Product. Program. Data. Machine learning and alike. The principles are the same on what Im teaching here.

The common thread is the same. You are leading people and outcomes inside a technical environment where trade offs matter.

Quick Access

</aside>

Part 1 | The Core Principle

Strong candidates do two things consistently:

They reduce rambling by using a repeatable structure.
They make ownership, trade-offs, and decision logic unmistakable.

Most candidates fail because:

They talk too long before making a point.
They describe activity instead of decisions.
They skip the trade-off and jump to the outcome.
They avoid risk language because it feels exposing.
They sound confident when rehearsed but lose clarity under pressure.

This guide is built to solve those directly.

Part 2 | The Framework to Make Judgment Visible

The Decision Story Framework

Use this structure for almost any leadership behavioural question.

Situation

The environment you were in and why it mattered. Keep it short. Name the pressure.
Constraint

What made this hard. Conflicting goals. Limited time. People capacity. Unclear data. Reliability risk. Stakeholder tension.
Options

What you could have done. Name at least two paths. This is where judgment begins to show.