- Date: 16 July 2025
- Time: 07:20 AM BST
- Incident Type: Formal Notice of Breach of Judicial Order Sent to Police Officer.
- Action Taken By: Myself (WASEEM BEY, as ": Waseem: Malik. - Secured Party Creditor").
- Action Directed To: PC Harriet Lacey (P4867).
- Subject: Breach of Judicial Order – Formal Notice Pursuant to Court Ruling (30 June 2025)
- Details of My Communication Sent:
- Formally notified PC Lacey that I consider her conduct and involvement in the events of 02 July 2025 to be a direct breach of the sealed court order issued on 30 June 2025 (Case Ref: 432500137947).
- Asserted that her initiation of the original unlawful seizure occurred after the court order was sealed and communicated, rendering it binding.
- Alleged Breaches of Law: Stated her conduct engages:
- Contempt of Court Act 1981.
- Abuse of Police Powers under Section 26 of the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015.
- Violations under the Human Rights Act 1998 (Articles 3, 5, and 8).
- Formal Notice Given: Informed her this notification is part of the formal record for pending criminal and judicial review proceedings, and that she is named directly in the "Judicial Fraud Dossier" and the private prosecution against Sgt. Matt Gleave.
- Deadline for Response: Invited her to provide a written representation or clarification regarding her actions no later than 17 July 2025.
- My Perception of Purpose & Impact:
- This is a formal pre-action communication that puts PC Lacey on direct, personal notice of her potential criminal and civil liability.
- It creates an undeniable paper trail proving that she was made aware of these serious allegations and was given an opportunity to respond.
- Her response—or lack thereof—will be a critical piece of evidence for all subsequent legal actions against her, including a potential private prosecution.
- This move isolates her as a central figure in the contempt and abuse of power, making it impossible for TVP to claim this is a vague institutional issue.