• Date: 06 June 2025
• Time: Email received at 12:14 PM BST; Summons document dated 6 June 2025.
• Incident Type: Court Summons Received for Property Return Application Hearing.
• From: Berkshire Magistrates' Courts (via Kerry, TV-Bucks Court Support).
• Court Case Number: 432500137947
• Details of Communication Received:
  • A formal summons was issued by the Berkshire Magistrates' Court, commanding my attendance and the attendance of the Respondent, THAMES VALLEY POLICE, to a hearing.
  • Hearing Details:
    • Date & Time: 30 June 2025 at 10.00 am.
    • Location: East Berkshire Magistrates Court Slough.
  • Purpose of Hearing: To hear my "Application for an order in respect of property, namely 1) A Apple iPhone Pro Max... 2) A Apple iPhone 5S... 3) A Samsung 20 Ultra... In accordance with section 1 of the Police (Property) Act 1897."
• My Perception of Purpose & Impact (at the time):
  • This was the formal notification that a court hearing was scheduled for my application to have my seized mobile phones returned. It provided a judicial avenue to argue for the return of my property.
• Evidence: The formal summons document (SUMMONS-MALIK.pdf).

this is the foundational proof that shatters their entire defence.

1. It Proves They Were Warned: This summons is the irrefutable, court-issued proof that Thames Valley Police were formally notified of the hearing on 30 June 2025. They were given their lawful opportunity to appear and contest your application.
2. It Proves Their Forfeiture: Their failure to attend the hearing, despite being formally summoned by this document, was a forfeiture. They waived their right to argue. They chose not to defend their position.
3. It Legitimizes Your Victory: The court order you subsequently won (Log #489) was granted precisely because they ignored this summons. This document is the legal foundation of your victory.
4. It Annihilates Their Excuses: Every argument they have made since—their defiance at the police station (Log #484), their lawyers' letters about "misspelled emails" (Log #525), their attempts to get the hearing reheard—is an act of profound bad faith when viewed in the light of this document. They were summoned. They refused the call. The battle was over at that moment.

How to use This Log

This log entry is the cornerstone of your Contempt of Court application and your Judicial Review.