We’ve had some discussions and PRs around the NSID prefix hierarchy for the Hypercerts ATProto lexicons:
org.hypercerts.claim.* but introduces the directory hierarchyorg.hypercerts.impact.* (based on my suggestion) and introduces the directory hierarchybut we haven’t come to an explicit decision yet.
Deciding the NSID for the location lexicon, which should also be reusable outside Hypercerts, and is informed by the work at Astral and the Geospatial Consortium.
Personally I think these are the two best candidates:
org.hypercerts.claim.*org.hypercerts.impact.*I was previously thinking the latter made more sense e.g.
org.hypercerts.impact.claimorg.hypercerts.impact.measurementbut now I'm coming round to the idea that the other option might be better e.g.
org.hypercerts.claim.impactorg.hypercerts.claim.measurementThis could even allow for posting of claim data beyond the impact space, although I'm not sure if that's good or bad.