System design is fundamentally about making the right trade-offs that balance competing priorities such as simplicity, scalability, performance, and complexity. This guide thoroughly explores key architectural trade-offs to help build resilient, scalable, and efficient systems.
YouTube video: https://youtu.be/2g1G8Jr88xU?si=jaXr9njh_UUjsD-C
1. Vertical Scaling vs. Horizontal Scaling
Vertical Scaling (Scaling Up)
- Definition: Increasing resources on existing servers, e.g., adding more CPU, memory, or upgrading hardware.
- Advantages:
- No code changes required.
- Easier management and simplicity.
- Disadvantages:
- Eventually hits a physical limit.
- Hardware upgrades can be expensive.
- Use Case: Suitable for early-stage or smaller-scale applications with moderate load.
Horizontal Scaling (Scaling Out)
- Definition: Adding more servers to distribute application load.
- Advantages:
- Virtually unlimited scaling potential.
- Improves fault tolerance by spreading load.
- Disadvantages:
- Introduces complexity with load balancing.
- Requires handling data consistency and distributed system challenges.
- Needs more engineering effort.
- Use Case: Large-scale applications needing growth beyond vertical limits.
Summary:
Aspect |
Vertical Scaling |
Horizontal Scaling |
Ease of management |
Easier |
More complex |
Scalability |
Limited (hardware bound) |
Virtually unlimited |
Cost |
Expensive upgrades |
Infrastructure & Dev efforts |
Fault tolerance |
Lower |
Higher |
Key Insight: The trade-off here is simplicity vs. scalability. Choose vertical scaling early on, then move to horizontal as growth requires.
2. REST APIs vs. GraphQL APIs
REST APIs