Examples

Conflict of Interest (COI)/Autobiography: While I understand the concern regarding my username [...]

Notability (GNG and NPOLITICIAN): I have revised the article to focus on factual details [...]

Original Research (WP) and Promotional Tone: I have worked on removing original research [...]

Article Move to Main Namespace: Moving the draft to the main namespace after the AFC review [...]

— From this October 2024 revision to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarwan Kumar Bheel

  1. Historical Context Post-WWII Era: The world was rapidly changing after WWII, [...] 2. Nuclear Arms Race: Following the U.S. atomic bombings, the Soviet Union detonated its first bomb in 1949, [...] 3. Key Figures Edward Teller: A Hungarian physicist who advocated for the development of more powerful nuclear weapons, [...] 4. Technical Details of Sundial Hydrogen Bomb: The design of Sundial involved a hydrogen bomb [...] 5. Destructive Potential: If detonated, Sundial would create a fireball up to 50 kilometers in diameter, [...] 6. Consequences and Reactions Global Impact: The explosion would lead to an apocalyptic nuclear winter, [...] 7. Political Reactions: The U.S. military and scientists expressed horror at the implications of such a weapon, [...] 8. Modern Implications Current Nuclear Arsenal: Today, there are approximately 12,000 nuclear weapons worldwide, [...] 9. Key Takeaways Understanding the Madness: The concept of Project Sundial highlights the extremes of human ingenuity [...] 10. Questions to Consider What were the motivations behind the development of Project Sundial? [...]

— From this November 2024 revision to Sundial (weapon)

AVO consists of three key layers:

— From this October 2025 revision to Draft:AI Visibility Optimization (AVO). Also note the rule of three.

Mass Content Removal: The user removed over 20,000 characters of reliably sourced content in a single edit, reducing the number of citations from 34 to 8, without any prior engagement on the Talk page.Disruptive Tagging: Despite the article being supported by 34 high-quality international secondary sources (Wall Street Journal, Bloomberg, Financial Times, etc.), the user implemented excessive "citation needed" tags as a form of visual vandalism to discredit the content.Refusal to engage (WP:BRD): The user was notified of WP:V and WP:DE policies on their talk page but has failed to justify these massive deletions, suggesting a coordinated attempt at de-legitimizing the subject.Context: Given the high-profile nature of the subject in global finance and mining (notably the AstraZeneca/EsoBiotec $1B M&A), the page is currently vulnerable to reputation-based sabotage.

— From this March 2026 revision to Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase