https://twitter.com/devonzuegel/status/952407915045859329?s=19
_
From Sari Azout newsletter #50
I enjoyed Jack Dorsey’s interview on The Daily, where he acknowledges some of Twitter’s early mistakes: “The disciplines that we were lacking in the company in the early days, that I wish we would have understood and hired for were a game theorist to just really understand the ramifications of tiny decisions that we make, such as what happens with retweet versus retweet with comment and what happens when you put a count next to a like button? Without this expertise, Twitter built incentives into the app that encouraged users and media outlets to write tweets and headlines that appealed to sensationalism instead of accuracy.” 🎙️
Clear examples of problems in incentivisation:
Recent personal example discovered upon reflection
Reading material:
[The Power of Incentives: The Hidden Forces That Shape Behavior](https://fs.blog/2017/10/bias-incentives-reinforcement/#:~:text=The Power of Incentives%3A The Hidden Forces That Shape Behavior,-Reading Time%3A 9&text=Incentives are what drive human,us to make major errors.)
Window tax
Mental models for incentive design
Goodhart’s law: measure should not itself become the target
From David Perrell:
The most famous example comes from the Soviet Union. When the factories were given targets for how many nails they needed to produce, they make small and useless nails. Then, when they were measured on the basis of weight, they made a few giant nails. Before the measure, numbers and weight correlated well with the success of a factory. But once they were made targets, the measurements lost their value.
Likewise, hospitals in Britain were taking too long to admit patients so a penalty was instituted for wait times longer than four hours. In response, some hospitals asked their ambulances to stall or take the long road to the hospital. Even though the roundabout path hurt patients, it shortened hospital wait times.