Problem

<aside> 💡 The value of a proposal (hypothesis) is estimated proactively through funding agreements (e.g. donations, grants, SAFT, etc), then retroactively amortized through accrual and scoring (pricing) of relative impact.

E.G. if the project was underfunded proactively relative to the impact they create, they would ideally get more retroactive funding than projects with a lower funding:impact ratio.

</aside>

Use Cases

<aside> 💡 Verification

<aside> 💡 Assist funding decision makers (donors & rounds sponsors) in assigning quantitative evaluations of project impact before allocating funds

Combining Pro & Retro Funding Cycles


Parallel Implementation by Spencer Cavanaugh

<aside> 💡 I think we were both scoping and designing our respective ideas over the same time, but had idea that was the case. Gonna chat ASAP to share learnings and future goals.

</aside>

[https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1p-a4fVGiZsHUaFKjbhEaL5SSaewygIWisBE2K9rVMmo/edit#slide=id.g2c5ea390e35_0_76](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1p-a4fVGiZsHUaFKjbhEaL5SSaewygIWisBE2K9rVMmo/preview#slide=id.g2c5ea390e35_0_76)