Trace the six missing Salesforce CallRail_Call_Log__c rows from the 30-day Google LSA audit so the upstream creation failures could be separated from the downstream blank-Intake__c issue.
/Users/samaguiar/Documents/Projects/Repos/sail-litify/Litify_AI_Integration_Project/output/lsa-callrail-ingestion-audit/2026-05-29T00-47-25-234Z/lsa-callrail-missing-salesforce.csv.LITIFY_ORG.Web_Form__c rows on any of the six caller phones, so the new web-form logging setup is not part of this failure lane./Users/samaguiar/Documents/Projects/Repos/sail-litify/Litify_AI_Integration_Project/output/lsa-callrail-ingestion-audit/2026-05-29T00-47-25-234Z/lsa-callrail-missing-salesforce-trace-2026-05-29.md./Users/samaguiar/Documents/Projects/Repos/sail-litify/Litify_AI_Integration_Project/docs/litify-environment-diary.md.Call Analysis email and no Salesforce CallRail_Call_Log__c row. These look like early-stage misses that stopped after the CallRail alert layer.Call Analysis email, but Salesforce only preserved a later May 20 CallRail row on the same phone linked to Sean's Intake. That points to downstream same-phone dedupe or wrong-call selection, not a pure non-creation miss.Townsend's phone already belonged to older Intake INT-26051955090 for Marion Hedgespeth, source Attorney Referral.
Paris's phone later became Intake INT-26051254830 under name Jose -, source Google LSA (Lexington).
This tracing pass reached a clean stopping point. The six-row evidence is classified and documented, and the next work is root-cause analysis on the creation path rather than more reconciliation.