<aside> ⭐

For +1 year, I led end-to-end design on a mission-critical search platform used daily by thousands of domain experts; orchestrating research, definition, design and handoff across a team of 4 designers, within a Scrum framework.

Evidence-led iteration shaped navigation, document viewing, and metadata flows, resulting in clearer, faster, more traceable workflows powered by a consistent, scalable Design System.

</aside>


Situation

🧭 Context & Challenge

A major European supranational organisation, one that operates across 38+ member states and manages one of the world's largest specialised document repositories, relied on a complex application as the primary daily tool for its expert workforce.

These users perform high-stakes, precision-intensive tasks: analysing, comparing, and evaluating large volumes of highly technical documentation as part of a legally consequential process.

<aside> 📊

Scale context

The platform serves thousands of domain experts across Europe, processing queries against a repository of millions of specialised documents. For these users, the platform is not a convenience; it is the primary instrument of their professional work. Every hour of friction at this scale compounds into significant lost productivity and quality risk across the organisation.

</aside>

The challenge was not to rebuild from scratch, but to elevate the end-to-end experience across several interconnected areas, without losing coherence with parallel product initiatives or with an established corporate Design System**.**

Incremental improvement at this level of complexity requires a fundamentally different discipline than greenfield design: every decision touches legacy patterns, technical constraints, and the deeply ingrained workflows of expert users.


🎯 My role & responsibilities

I was brought in as Lead Product Designer, acting as design lead for a team of 4 and as the primary bridge between business stakeholders, product management, and engineering, within an active Scrum delivery framework.

Responsibility Description
Design leadership Setting design direction, making interaction and system decisions, ensuring quality and coherence across all 4 team members and multiple parallel workstreams.
Research orchestration Planning and running a mixed-methods research programme — interviews, workshops, and quantitative surveys — to generate evidence that drove backlog priorities.
Design System governance Maintaining coherence with the corporate Design System, proposing extensions where necessary, and preventing pattern divergence across parallel search initiatives.
Engineering bridge Reducing implementation ambiguity through precise specs, annotated handoff, and Jira traceability — ensuring what was designed was what got built.
Stakeholder alignment Facilitating cross-team alignment across concurrent search workstreams to avoid duplication and maintain systemic coherence.

Four strategic fronts defined the scope:


Design Process