How I turned a prose UX writing guide into a structured, machine-readable content system inside a product design system.
Role: Senior UX Writer and Content Designer · Product: a self-custody crypto wallet · Surface: the product's design system, in Notion · Scope: sole editorial owner
<aside> 🧭
In short. The product's UX writing standards lived as a single prose guide: readable by people, invisible to the systems that increasingly depend on copy. I migrated the entire guide into the design system using a content engineering approach. Codifiable rules and patterns became 60 structured, versioned Library entries; voice and rationale became canonical design-system pages. The guide is now a frozen reference archive, every section pointing to its new home. Content became a system with one source of truth, read by both people and machines.
</aside>
The Product Content Guide was a comprehensive, well-written Notion document covering voice, tone, microcopy patterns, vocabulary, localization, and governance. It served writers well. But as a document, it had reached three limits:
Rather than copy the guide into the design system, I treated content as typed, addressable, version-controlled infrastructure. The core move was to split content by type.
| Surface | Role | Consumer |
|---|---|---|
| Design system content pages | Canonical, human-authored standards | People |
| Content Library | Codified mirror: the same rules and patterns as structured rows with stable slugs | Machines (codegen, linters, agents) |
| Product Content Guide | Frozen archive: the original prose, migrated section by section | Historical reference |
One principle holds the system together: every piece of content has exactly one canonical home. Nothing is maintained in two places.
I ran the migration as a single loop, applied to every section in turn.