Dr. Akoma’s experience spans prospecting, eligibility triage, narrative development, compliance reporting, and post-award management. The dominant frictions are: (1) point-of-service record-keeping that collapses at reporting time, (2) fragmented prospecting (federal + philanthropic) that requires manual heuristics, (3) heavy eligibility/data pulls from long RFPs, (4) compressed submission windows paired with long, variable award timelines, and (5) internal scope-creep that misaligns delivery with what was proposed. She also highlights improving SIS/reporting tools (e.g., Tableau plugins) but notes they don’t solve ongoing evidence capture—the true choke point. Dr. Ahuna Akoma - Ryan Rodriguez
Detailed Description
Frontline staff often don’t log who was served, when, and how—so compliance evidence (attendance, dosage, outcomes) is missing at report time. This creates last-minute scrambles through paper trails and ad-hoc spreadsheets, and undermines the ability to prove outcomes or pass audits. Dr. Ahuna Akoma - Ryan Rodriguez
Direct Quotes
Impact & Severity
Major: jeopardizes reimbursement and narrative credibility; adds days/weeks of rework; raises audit risk. Dr. Ahuna Akoma - Ryan Rodriguez
Current Workaround
Manual reminders, collecting sign-in sheets, late spreadsheet consolidation; no systematic, real-time capture at the program site. Dr. Ahuna Akoma - Ryan Rodriguez
Detailed Description
Discovery mixes federal portals, Google searching, and foundation websites. She built her own database of foundations and evaluates fit by studying past grantees, award sizes, and cycles. She reports that, recently, many federal entries she relied on “got stripped away,” pushing her toward private funders. Dr. Ahuna Akoma - Ryan Rodriguez
Direct Quotes