questions:
limitations of DAO, what DAO can change
how many ogNFT would be on total
DAO is slow, the goal is to automate everything
ideas
no taking anything back, over time we can proof of participation.
I also like never taking back but maybe vote weight reduces over time if holder does not participate in governance and refreshes with every vote and or discussion. Somewhat like VeCRV vote weight reduces. Have to hop off though.
karma:
s10 - badgest for different achivements (4: completeing to call, tech, social achivment, community). more you have them - more befit
Vanpe: Another mechanism could be every time there’s a voting, if you didn’t vote you loose some points. I like the idea. We can do - for everyone vote, you get or if you miss.
Xardas - people can share their points as respect. Like steem? On ENS - to change constitution - would show change 2/3 of ENS votes and at least 1% of tokens threshold. or for example any proposal can be flagged by an ogNFT as a ‘constitutional’ change, and then it will require majority approval from ogNFT. ogNFT main role - is to protect values. cNFT - rewarding people who participate.
link to ENS proposed constitution: https://discuss.ens.domains/t/proposed-ens-constitution/814#v-amendments-to-this-constitution-by-majority-vote-5
Mooncat - Incognito had also something similar. If you received x likes or mentions or whatever you got a badge.
Garret - like the system that other people can vote someone like who’s the best connecter, who gives the best ideas etc etc and people get votes and poap for their nomination
Joey - I like the karma, would be diff to implement on blockchain. You have to think about how get SuDAO because of finite suuply, here with karma shouldn't care about supply.
voting power NFT vs
s10 - what's the goal? avoid steem sutuation. then at least 50% for NFT.
Joey 50-60%, 40% ogNFT, 20% cNFT, 40% suDAO
Mooncat - ‘how about all voting power goes to suDAO, but ogNFT have veto right?
Xardas - NFT and suDAO calc separetely.
Who's issuing NFT tokens
Xardas: different categories. ogNFT - vouche by other sign. Need to protect propotol integrity. 150 people limit for ogNFT. the number of allowed ogNFTs is relative to certain metrics of the platform. there is a link between ogNFT and the ogNFTs that you invited (you are liable in some way) I agree with Moon Cat.
if all ogNFT lost access.
mooncat: But what’s the point of issuing cNFTs for OGNFTs? Well, if I think that someone can serve the project and adds value, I’d invite. Why should I get a bounty for that? Agree too, if someone will add value to the project you'll benefit in the long run from the value they add. No need for a short term bounty reward in my opinion. Also, Mouse is real if there was a concern there. He's doxxed in another group.
og members already invited, I think new og members should be checked by the core team what value they can add, if they’re ‘useful’.
We talk about incentivizing community engagement here - I am also concerned about protecting the integrity of the protocol . I suppose this is a topic for later or it has already been solved? With integrity of the protocol, i mean: how we protect against hostile takeover (eg. imposing KYC requirements xD)
Alternative to DAO could also be highly anonymous core team of
Maybe a difficult to exeute thought, but what if the ogNFT holders can be elected by cNFT? So if ogNFT members really go against the goods of the project the ogNFT can be outvoted?
Delegation worries me as it’s highly personal (tied to delegate personal identity) and this project is at risk for personal targeting
Thinking about the way ENS did it: If everything is up for a vote, we should maintain a (minimal) constitution to guarantee that no changes can be approved that would undermine essential aspects (no touching user funds, decentralizationl..) random thought to protect constitution: all proposals need to pass approval vote from ogNFT first
Maybe a difficult to exeute thought, but what if the ogNFT holders can be elected by cNFT? So if ogNFT members really go against the goods of the project the ogNFT can be outvoted?
maybe the current core team could have other type of nft with for example summary 10% weight. In case of project-change-important-proposals it could be like fuse to avoid attacks
We can have a mechanism where ogNFT loses relevance over time as it needs to be matched with other incentives (eg. POAPs or time funds locked..)