https://www.elliptic.co/blog/crypto-regulatory-affairs-sec-sets-the-stage-for-defi-oversight?utm_campaign=Elliptic Essentials | Crypto Regulatory Affairs&utm_medium=email&_hsmi=203154363&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-_bb_Txc5FfITdcnzSNmYwiftUOc07tmRBxDnAKiYh32IxFHE-ZBMx4XLzG9Vbf_nT4YPjOFBXnvwpx7XqYhvLwbt_-hg&utm_content=203154691&utm_source=hs_email
Elliptic Global Policy and Research Group
The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has announced proposed changes to its application of regulatory requirements that could fundamentally reshape the decentralized finance (DeFi) space.
On January 26th, the SEC – the primary US regulator with oversight of securities markets – issued a 654-page proposed ruling that would amend the definition of an exchange under US securities law.
The SEC’s proposed changes – which are subject to a mere 30-day public comment period – would include in the definition of a securities exchange “systems that offer the use of non-firm trading interest and communication protocols to bring together buyers and sellers of securities”. If adopted, this provision would likely bring many DeFi applications (DApps) – which operate using smart contracts that automatically match buyers and sellers of cryptoassets, rather than maintaining centralized order books – squarely within the SEC’s remit. DApps that serve US customers would be brought within the scope of regulation for Alternative Trading Systems (ATSs) – electronic trading systems that match buy and sell orders as an alternative to public markets – and would be required to register as exchanges or broker-dealers with the SEC.
Though some within the cryptoasset industry have raised concerns that this measure could harm innovation in the DeFi space. SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce – known for her innovation-friendly stances on crypto matters – issued a dissent to the proposed rule. She argued that the short timeframe for public feedback fails to allow for “careful consideration and informed comment on how this change would affect innovation and competition in this space”.
The move should come as no surprise, however. SEC Chair Gary Gensler has spoken repeatedly in public about the need to bring the booming DeFi space within the regulatory perimeter. As the proposed rulemaking argues, a situation where DeFi platforms allow users to trade without regulatory oversight and facilitate arbitrage “can create a competitive imbalance and a lack of investor protections”.
As noted in Elliptic’s November 2021 report DeFi: Risk, Regulation, and the Rise of DeCrime, investor loss is a major problem in the DeFi space. Our research shows that in 2021 losses from hacks and exploits of DeFi protocols total $10.5 billion, which is up from $1.5 billion in 2020.
In the early days of 2022, this trend looks set to continue. On February 2nd, hackers managed to steal $325 million from Wormhole, a DeFi bridge service – making it the fourth largest hack ever targeting a cryptoasset service. These major attacks will only reinforce regulators’ views that the DeFi space requires greater oversight and accountability. Already this year, US regulators levied a $1.4 million penalty on DeFi predictions platform Polymarket for failing to adequately register with the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).
Elliptic’s DeFi report demonstrated that criminals are increasingly looking to DeFi platforms to launder funds. As regulatory scrutiny of the DeFi space intensifies, the industry will be expected to apply anti-money laundering (AML) and other financial crime controls to manage these risks. Developers of DeFi platforms – as well as compliance teams from centralized cryptoasset exchanges and financial institutions that interact with DeFi protocols – will need to ensure they have appropriate controls in place to detect and manage related risks.
Elliptic’s solutions for screening cryptoasset wallets and transactions can assist your business in detecting DeFi-related risks. Contact us today to learn more.
UK Issues Tax Guidance on DeFi Lending and Staking
It’s not just the US that’s focused on the implications of DeFi. This week, the UK took steps on DeFi, but from an all together different angle: taxation. HM Revenue & Customs – the country’s tax agency – issued updated guidance on February 2nd describing the tax treatment of DeFi lending and staking activities. The guidance stipulates that when a user lends or stakes funds in a DeFi protocol, this will trigger a taxable event on their returns. Though the manner in which any returns are taxed – as capital or revenue – will depend on the individual circumstances. The industry trade body CryptoUK has criticized the guidance, claiming it provides little clarity and is inconsistent with other aspects of the UK’s cryptoasset policy approach.
India also took steps on crypto taxation last week, when it announced on January 31st that gains from cryptoasset trading will be subject to a 30% capital gains tax. Some observers interpreted this announcement as an indication that India is legitimizing crypto and may have backed away from previous threats to ban digital assets. Others, however, pointed out that announcing a taxation policy on cryptoassets does not mean India has legalized them. Indeed, that same day the country also indicated it intends to launch a central bank digital currency (CBDC) before the end of 2023, which may indicate the government is implementing a punitive tax policy to discourage crypto trading as it paves the way for adoption of its digital rupee.
Wait?! Three crypto tax stories in one week, you say? Yep, that’s right. On January 31st, Thailand announced that it was dropping plans to impose a 15% withholding tax on crypto trades. Following backlash from traders and industry participants, Thai officials stated that crypto profits should instead be taxed as capital gains. However, regulators there have not changed their plans to restrict the use of cryptoassets for merchant payments. In January, citing concerns about price stability and fraud, they announced that cryptoasset service providers may not offer payment facilitation services to merchants. As Elliptic’s Director of Policy and Regulatory Affairs David Carlisle told the FT, a prohibition on the facilitation of crypto payments could be avoided by instead requiring merchant payment gateways to implement certain safeguards and controls – such as AML controls – for crypto payments.
On January 27th, Hong Kong regulators announced that retail investors will not be permitted to trade Bitcoin exchange traded funds (ETFs). According to a circular issued jointly by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority, crypto ETFs may only be traded by professional investors. Citing the risks of investing in crypto markets, the regulatory intervention is hardly surprising, particularly since Hong Kong has previously indicated that retail investors will not be permitted to trade cryptoassets directly under new rules the country intends to adopt – likely later this year.
Myanmar’s Embrace of Digital Currencies Raises Sanctions Questions