Agenda
- Comp distro vs comp value
- What degrees of centralization?
- yPeople and yBudgets
- Dispute resolution
- Team set salaries and budgets
- Full transparency
Meeting Notes
- Growth pain points
- Projections
- Needs change and need to be able to adapt
- S1 Comp was done loosely, and left up to projects and guilds which created some conversations between them to ask how it was done
- Guidance given that work should be done at 1000 BANK and hour from GC, @ BANK = 0.10
- Tensions now coming up regarding payments, and want to get ahead of any issues that may arise
- Project
- Education project to do videos on how to do DAO tools like discord and estimate was 120K BANK
- Legal guild 3 editions of newsletter was also 120K BANK and thought this was more effort
- Guild
- Comp working group setup to work on some concerns that are coming up but also to be proactive
Guidelines
- Lets create a document and framework for compensation for projects and guilds to use to make better decisions for their funding requests by the end of Season 2
- Governance rights as a working group
- How do we pay?
- Should it modify on location (SF vs. Phillipines)
- Should it modify based on skill (Developer vs. Designer)
- Should teams have set budgets/salaries?
- How do we distribute?
- What degree of Centralization do we want to
- Yearn is one of the most advanced DAOs in terms of governance, shipping and managing community
- They have yPeople and yBudget communities that support the other working groups
- Have fewer working groups than bDAO
- FrogMonkee doesn't think we need to be as centralized, but maybe governance is needed to standardize how comp is done across the DAO
- Some enforncement of guidelines
- Help shape budgetary ask
- Should it be top down compensation asks are formatted and have some control over making sure they fit within the governance framework
- Use guidance as reference
- Serve as a point of
- Comp from the DAO needs to be fully transparent
- This should be a requirement to be paid by the DAO in the first place
- Some people do not fully agree with this
- DAO Wide soft consensus was taken (find link) to provide full transparency to total DAO comp
- on KPIs
- Tie projects to KPIs
- Tie comp to KPIs
- Process to request remuneration
- Goes to Forum
- Goes to GC
- At any time, someone can raise objection to how the funding request doesn't match the framework and guidance
- Grendel suggests training or mentoring people creating requests for the first time
- Consistency is a key item - people should get paid similarly for doing the same type of work