Sam flagged the Sponsor Directory static review page because it included Churchill Downs as a sponsor candidate. Sam confirmed the firm does not sponsor Churchill Downs. I corrected the local, draft-only review surface and hardened the local rebuild path so the false row is not regenerated.
/Users/samaguiar/Documents/Projects/admin/community-hub-2026-06-14/static-review/sponsor-directory.html./Users/samaguiar/Documents/Projects/admin/community-hub-2026-06-13/data/public-safe-sponsor-directory-review-2026-06-13.csv.vendor_center rows in the review CSV to Needs sponsorship verification before use.Public-Safe Directory Draft to Private Evidence Review Draft.QA artifact: /Users/samaguiar/Documents/Projects/admin/community-hub-2026-06-14/static-review-sponsor-directory-correction-qa-2026-06-15.json.
Passed checks: current static page has 33 rows, current CSV has 33 rows, June 4 derived CSV has 33 rows, June 4 preview blocks have 33 rows, the bad name is absent from all corrected review surfaces, all 9 vendor-center rows are held, the builder guards are present, and both patched Python files compile.
Browser note: the Codex Browser plugin previously rejected local file:// reloads under its security policy, so this pass used static parser QA instead of browser automation.
Rollback copies are saved at /Users/samaguiar/Documents/Projects/admin/community-hub-2026-06-14/rollback/2026-06-15-sponsor-directory-churchill-before/.
vendor_center rows are not sponsor-ready. They need sponsorship or marketing evidence before publication.