This affidavit highlights two certified court orders issued in close succession:
- Order dated 30 June 2025 (Log #396) — granted full return of seized property
- Order dated 21 July 2025 (Log #489) — denied same request, without rationale
These contradictory rulings violate:
- Article 6 (right to fair trial) – by undermining judicial certainty
- Protocol 1, Article 1 (peaceful enjoyment of possessions) – by enabling property deprivation
The orders reference the exact same property under s.1 Police (Property) Act 1897, but were issued under separate case numbers with no legal justification for conflict.
| Annex | Title | Log Ref |
|---|---|---|
| A | Court Order – 30 Jun 2025 – Property Return | #396 |
| B | Court Order – 21 Jul 2025 – Denial | #489 |
| C | ECHR Index – Section II.1 & II.2 | — |
| D | Attachment Note – Article 6/A1P1 Violation Summary | — |
Judicial_Contradiction_Affidavit_Malik_25Jul25.pdf
support_docs / HighCourt / WitnessStatements / Contradiction_Sequence_Bundle.pdf
Affidavit – Judicial Contradiction Under Police (Property) Act 1897