Summary of work done

I attempted to run the daily Litify attribution GCLID propagation workflow from the local automation path, but the command surface failed before process startup. The unified exec tool returned Failed to create unified exec process: No such file or directory (os error 2) on every command attempt, which prevented reading the automation memory and runbook through the shell, prevented running the Node harness, and prevented generating daily-gclid-propagation-report.json.

I tried a second local path through Computer Use. Terminal automation was blocked for safety reasons, and the fallback VS Code terminal surface was not usable for reliable command-output capture. Because the runner never started, no Salesforce writes were attempted, no blank-field repairs ran, no Google Ads Sheet sync was triggered, and no rollback artifact or rollback command was produced.

I completed the required read-only Outlook enrichment audit instead:

Reason for session ending

The session ended because the required local automation runner could not be started from this surface, and there was no alternate read-only Salesforce or Litify connector exposed in-session to replace the blocked command lane.

Suggested next steps

If the local shell surface is restored, rerun the canonical automation immediately so the JSON report becomes the source of truth for counts, conflicts, safe repairs, and sheet sync behavior. If a Salesforce or Litify read connector is made available first, use it to cross-check the identified webform, CallRail, and SpeedAI examples against CallRail_Call_Log__c, Web_Form__c, Intake, Matter, Task, and any RingSense evidence before any write lane is reopened.

Handoff for a new agent

The main fact to preserve is that this was a tooling failure, not a live-data conclusion. Two Judith H Head website-intake emails carried clear positive GCLIDs and Litify intake IDs, while other recent intake emails showed blank or partial attribution. There is also at least one concrete CallRail after-hours call with matching analysis evidence and several SpeedAI alerts worth cross-referencing once a live Litify read path is available. No systems were modified in this session, so there is nothing to roll back. Use the blocked shell state as the first problem to solve, then rerun the automation rather than trying to infer command-lane outcomes from the mail evidence alone.