Page reviewed: https://aguiarinjurylawyers.com/practice-areas/delivery-vehicle-accidents/doordash-delivery-accidents/

What was accomplished:

• Ran desktop and mobile QA on the page's two visual table sections: DoorDash coverage windows and DoorDash crash risk factors.
• Confirmed the core issue is layout/configuration, not missing content.
• Produced an HTML/CSS mockup bundle with three directions.
• Recommended Option A, Coverage Timeline plus Risk Matrix, as the best publish direction.
• No live WordPress changes were made in this pass.

QA findings:

• Coverage windows are readable, but the three-card desktop layout feels cramped and does not communicate sequence well.
• The risk-factor section is the bigger problem. Current CSS mixes card-grid rules with a forced row/table override, so it looks neither like polished cards nor a true table.
• Desktop risk rows have narrow text and awkward whitespace.
• Mobile is readable but visually long and heavy.
• The page would benefit from a scoped CSS/content structure cleanup, not a raster image asset.

Mockups created:

• Option A, recommended: Coverage Timeline plus Risk Matrix. Best authority lift and scan speed. Keeps page lightweight and makes coverage sequence plus risk proof clearer.
• Option B: Evidence Cards. Most conservative visually, but less table-like.
• Option C: Mobile Accordion plus Desktop Scroll Table. Most interactive and closest to the approved comparison-table pattern, but likely heavier than needed.

Artifacts:

• QA/report folder: /Users/samaguiar/Documents/New project/outputs/wp-fixes/doordash-table-qa-2026-05-13/
• Report: /Users/samaguiar/Documents/New project/outputs/wp-fixes/doordash-table-qa-2026-05-13/doordash-table-qa-report.md