Filed By: :Waseem: Malik. – Living Man, Sui Juris
Core Complaint Ref: 556213
HOS Case Ref: 202507697
Judicial Review Ref: AC-2025-LON-001909
ECHR Relevance: Violation of Articles 3, 6, and 8
This document codifies the central doctrine of the claimant’s legal challenge: that Abri Group Limited, upon failing to address targeted harassment by neighbours, shifted its corporate responsibility by engaging Thames Valley Police as a retaliatory enforcement arm.
This strategic deflection not only compounded the harm — it weaponized law enforcement against a vulnerable individual already suffering under institutional neglect.
The culmination of this abuse was executed by PC Harriet Lacey, who unlawfully seized the claimant's medical devices (phones), contravening a sealed High Court protection order, and acting in defiance of procedural law and basic human rights.
This was not negligence. It was persecution.
| Log/Exhibit | Contents |
|---|---|
| Log #466 | Evidence of staff-police collusion |
| Log #471 | Ten-hour harassment campaign |
| Log #512 | Witnessed hate crime |
| Exhibit J | Affidavit of Standing / High Court Order |
| Exhibit AA | Information laid against PC Lacey |
| Exhibit W | Fraud Upon the Court Dossier |
| Exhibit Z | HOS Activation Entry |
| Attached Document | Conditional Consent Email from Abri – Confirming partnership with police under “standard processes” |