Project name/Protocol: projectNAME Date: DD/MM/YYYY Previous Report: Link to previous report
Author: name Reviewed by: name Report version: Report v2
<aside> 💡 Instructions Please fill in all questions with a written explainer, any relevant links, and score per variable. Insert the scores in the scorecard at the end of the report. Please include your sources into the text (as a link), so others can follow your trail of thought.
</aside>
Provide your name and (if you like) add some info about your background and add socials (e.g. Twitter handle)
| 1. Value Proposition | Points |
|---|---|
| 1.1. Novelty of the solution | X / 15 |
| 1.2. Market fit/demand | X / 15 |
| 1.3. Target Market Size | X / 10 |
| 1.4. Competitiveness within market sector(s) | X / 10 |
| 1.5. Integrations & Partnerships | X / 15 |
| Total - Value Proposition | X / 65 |
| 2. Token-economics | Points |
| 2.1. What is the extent of the token's capabilities? | X / 10 |
| 2.2. Initial token allocation | X / 15 |
| 2.3. Continuous token issuance & tokeneconomic mechanisms | X / 10 |
| 2.4. Is the value capture model able to accrue and distribute value? | X / 10 |
| 2.5. Is the token sufficiently liquid to enable active use and trade? | X / 5 |
| 2.6. Are there any extrinsic productivity use cases? | X / 10 |
| Total - Tokenomics | X / 60 |
| 3. Team | Points |
| 3.1. Is the team credible and public? | X / 15 |
| 3.2. Does the team have relevant experience? | X / 10 |
| 3.3. Does the team participate and help shape the public debate? | X / 5 |
| 3.4. Is the team able to effectively attract and coordinate resources? | X / 10 |
| Total - Team | X / 40 |
| 4. Regulatory | Points |
| 4.1. Does the protocol have any legal accountability? | X / 15 |
| 4.2. What is the quality of the legal jurisdiction? | X / 10 |
| Total - Regulatory | X / 25 |
| 5. Community and engagement | Points |
| 5.1. Community size | X / 5 |
| 5.2. Activity and engagement | X / 5 |
| 5.3. Development and governance involvement | X / 5 |
| 5.4. Community-driven initiatives | X / 5 |
| 5.5. Partnerships/collaborations | X / 5 |
| Total Points - Community and engagement | X / 25 |
| 6. Tech | Points |
| 6.1 Opensource | X / 15 |
| 6.2. Smart Contracts usage | X / 25 |
| 6.3. Audit | X / 20 |
| Total - Tech | X / 60 |
| Overall | X / 275 |
This is something we put into the page on openrating.xyz. It allows people to get the common idea, before diving into the report.
Write down summary of what you’ve done here in 2-5 sentences (or ask AI to help you ;)