There are six 时间研究书简 (literally "Time Research Letters"). They can be read in forward or reverse order. The third one is incomplete, the rest are in completed draft form.

Chapter 1: A Testament

Chapter 2: The Initiate's Creed

Chapter 3: A Letter to the Editor

Chapter 4: The Dreamer and The Redacter

Chapter 5: A Puzzle

Chapter 6: Levels of Induction


A Yevaud Production. If you don't understand color, read Usage of Color/Register.

Questions?

We reject the infamous Queen Elizabeth clause.

the Infamous Queen Elizabeth clause

Parables and Quotables

What's your name? Don't have one. / What's your institution code? Don't have one. / I will put "code pending" on the form and move on.

I've developed a time machine. The code is pending. With enough prayer, we expect to roll this out to everyone by the year 2030.

The project implementation status was at Hoax. Then it was Redacted. Now it is at Code Pending. I'm not sure if there has been any improvement.

“Not everyone is capable of madness; and of those lucky enough to be capable, not many have the courage for it.” - August Strindberg

LONG ABSTRACT

The author has been researching the philosophy of time-travel for the past 5 years. We model several "time machines" (including The TimeExplorer 3000 and The Mars Ansible), and use a series of classification schemes (Top Secret classification) and compensation schemes (Independence Compensation) to explain their consistency.

One of those secrets relates to the nature of a [{divine}] being, which we refer to as השם. This would traditionally be represented in English as "the Lᴏʀᴅ", but the author feels that, depending on context, either "The Guild" or "The Holy Spirit" is a better translation. This secret nature has severely impeded research in this area.

We turn to the law. While certain laws may be given by השם, they must be understood in the context they were given. Not all truth can be found in a narration across thousands of years. We consider which of the Laws are determined by השם, and which by Common Consent. We consider a variety of ethical codes, before turning to the applied laws of Land Stewardship, Education, and Work. (see Early Version for an outline)

While we have engaged in some research in Deeper Mysteries, I have not yet achieved any Publishable results. Research into the nature of השם has also not yet achieved any Publishable results.

Institution Status

(code pending) is primarily computational. (code pending) has but two pairs of safety glasses, though plenty of facemasks and blindfolds.

Our publishing institution is Notion . We consider them to be valued at $900 billion for insurance purposes.

After reviewing an incident involving the University of Minnesota, we have dismantled any semblance of an independent Institutional Review Board.

University of Minnesota researchers issue apology letter to the Linux community